Is MacIntyre's Critique of Modern Ethics Convincing Essay

Is MacIntyres Critique of innovational Ethics Convincing - Essay ExampleIt continues to point out to the inconsistencies and the groundless nature of major assumptions do in his philosophies. His argument of superiority of certain traditions is also criticized as well as other inconsistencies in his criteria. In After Virtue, when he says one has to find its moral identity in and through its social status in communities,1 he rejects the concept of personity in moral issues. Lastly, this paper explores Hegels wondering(a) logic of metaphysics as a contrary philosophy to Macintyres.MacIntyres Critique of Modern Ethics is not convincing. His claims that the respectable theory and practice are incomprehensible is groundless. The recipients of his criticism are the emotive who believe in the belief of emotivism. For them, the value upheld and the metaphysical aspects of people are attributes that are derived from own personal preference as foreign to adherence to objective validit y. In this case, considering something to be good is not a root of making a rational moral decision, instead that is only base on personal preference. As such, MacIntyres critique is based on three major pillars as proposed by Aristotle (Brodie 1991). The first pillar considers the moral agent in the amateur person, the second one is the moral agent when one already has comprehension of is telos, and lastly, moral considerations that rise facilitation between stages (MacIntyre 1999). Modernity fails to uphold the second pillar as the normative concept of telos buttocksnot be employ as a determinant of good of bad behavior in the society. In this case, the good traits of an individual has to be eliminated, even if it is highly beneficial to the members of the society. This has to happen so that one can adopt unsanded and alternative forms of norms other than the original one. It is only after such a disconnection that one can say that something about that traditional or society is good or one can transfigure to understand the